- You were poorly dressed
- You were overaggressive
- You were unable to express information clearly
- You lacked interest and enthusiasm
- You displayed no career planning
- You appeared nervous and lacking in confidence
- You overemphasised the importance of the pay for the job
- You were unwilling to start at the bottom
- You made excuses
- You were lacking in tact and courtesy
- You appeared immature
- You condemned your past employers
- You displayed no genuine in the company or the job
- You failed to look the interviewer in the eye
- Your application form was poorly completed
- You didn't seem to have a sense of humour
- You were late for the interview
- You failed to express appreciation for the interviewer's time
- You failed to ask questions about the company and the job
- Your responses to questions were vague
A few questions though:
- The survey was undertaken in 1986: do you think the results would be the same if repeated today?
- Would the results be the same if European HR Managers were asked to list their reasons for rejecting candidates?
- Would the results be the same if it was line managers rather that HR Managers who were asked to rate their reasons for rejection?
It’s interesting that the majority of these reasons would probably map across to many other human interactions. So, why did the blind date fail? Well, he was poorly dressed, over aggressive, lacked enthusiasm, appeared immature, turned up late, was unwilling to start at the bottom – not sure about that one but you never know!!
ReplyDeleteI guess today you might get a ‘didn’t meet the required competency scores’ in the list and there would be other politically correct answers but boil it down to the nitty gritty and I don’t think selection will ever really get away from the impressions you have about an individual. You could have the greatest experience in the world but if a number of the reasons above are applicable – then you are probably on a hiding to nothing.
EBTG
Inversly if you are well dressed, aggressive, confident, mature, praised your previous employers, constantly looked the interviewer in the eye, you were early, asking a lot of probing questions about the position.
ReplyDeleteMay not either get the position. I find job interviews are also about power positioning. A younger interviewer who is still hesitant, may look on positively when the interviewee takes the lead, but an older interviewer may consider such behaviour as threatening.
Just goes to show - interviews are far from perfect!
ReplyDeleteEBTG
well i agree that if we take all these things inversely then interviewee again not get the job cause it depends on the criteria of interview and on interviewer!
ReplyDelete